i do not see a difference that is huge enough for the 3ds to be weak in comparison to the ps vita. Do you guys think the difference is big or only a little bit of a improvement. I mean, not only is sony making a larger profit off of the vita while nintendo is only making a slight profit, but the vita boasts ps3 graphics and a slightly downgraded engine. The vita looks like a portable wii and the 3ds xl looks like a portable gamecube/xbox. I just don't see a big difference. The vita's backgrounds look slightly less pixelated than the 3ds xl's. I do not see the vita's huge graphical leap or it's ps3 graphics. Do you guys agree with me? Or do think the difference is huge. I think that the 3ds needs great games to negate the graphical difference and a better value price to fight the competition of the vita. Wait the 3ds already has that! The games are better to a larger audience(you might prefer the vitas games, but i am talking about the average consumer), and the value for your dollar is better, all while the graphical difference isn't that huge. What's your input on the ps vita vs. 3ds xl/3ds competition. Oh, i almost forgot about the sd/memory card thing. That is the most obvious attempt to get more money out of a consumer because not only does it take 50$ to get 3 gigabytes,while the 3ds comes with a 2g sd card(xl comes with 4g), but in order to use the ps shop, you need the memory. What do you think about all of this?